
Report on Dr. Heale’s Paper on the Physiological Anatomy of the Lungs A large portion of Dr. Heale’s paper is occupied by details that have been already given by previous observers. His statement that the divisions of the bronchial tubes is neither dichotomous nor trichotomous but strictly that of a panicle, is anticipated by Russeisen who in Plate 1 represents the alternate branching of a main bronchial tube. The corresponding subdivision of the pulmonary artery and bronchial tubes so that the artery penetrates each lobule in conjunction with the tube / pp 13.22.61/; and the origins of the pulmonary veins from the periphery of the lubules / pp 13.23./; which are described by Dr. Heale at great length and without reference to any previous observer, have already been well detailed by Russeisen, Bourgery, Addison, and Rossignol. Thus Russeisen says , “Et enim
Please login to transcribe
Manuscript details
- Author
- James Newton Heale
- Reference
- RR/4/124
- Series
- RR
- Date
- 1860
- IIIF
-
(What's this?)This is a link to the IIIF web URL for this item. You can drag and drop the IIIF image link into other compatible viewers
Cite as
Referee report by F. Sibson on 'Physiological Anatomy of the Lungs' by J. N. Heale, 1860. From The Royal Society, RR/4/124
Comments