
injections to establish this point. Under those circumstances it must be admitted that this remarkable statement is not established by Dr. Heale in the paper sent in by him to the Society. Dr. Heale has laboured with great zeal at the minute anatomy of the lungs, he has made many successful injections & has proved his candour & good faith by submitting those injections freely to the Referee. Many of the Points advanced by Dr. Heale are accurate, but these have for the most part been already described by previous observers. On the other hand he has failed to establish those points in which he is undoubtedly original that I have subjected to enquiry, and some of which are indeed disproved by his own prepara= =tions. The only author named by Dr. Heale and that incidentally is Rossignol but his paper is full of allusions deprecating in singular language the writings of other observers, but in no instance referring to them by name Under these circumstances, after
Please login to transcribe
Manuscript details
- Author
- James Newton Heale
- Reference
- RR/4/124
- Series
- RR
- Date
- 1860
- IIIF
-
(What's this?)This is a link to the IIIF web URL for this item. You can drag and drop the IIIF image link into other compatible viewers
Cite as
Referee report by F. Sibson on 'Physiological Anatomy of the Lungs' by J. N. Heale, 1860. From The Royal Society, RR/4/124
Comments