Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Paper reference code: B.43

Hogben provides extensive criticism of Pincus's writing style, stating that it is below the standard of publication for the Society. Nevertheless he believes the work to be of great importance. 'The figures leave no doubt that we have here a case of genuine mammalian parthenogenesis' and Hogben suggests 'that the Society reconsider it for publication' if Pincus rewrites the paper.

[Not published].

Received

Reference number
RR/W/7/28
Earliest possible date
10 January 1939
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Typescript

Creator names

Lancelot Thomas Hogben

View page for Lancelot Thomas Hogben

Lancelot Thomas Hogben

View page for Lancelot Thomas Hogben

Use this record

Citation

Lancelot Thomas Hogben, Lancelot Thomas Hogben, Letter from Lancelot Hogben to [John David] Griffith Davies, regarding a paper 'The comparative behaviour of mammalian eggs in vivo and in vitro. II. The development of fertilized and artificially activated rabbit eggs' by G [George] Pincus, 10 January 1939, RR/W/7/28, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_w_7_28/letter-from-lancelot-hogben-to-john-david-griffith-davies-regarding-a-paper-the-comparative-behaviour-of-mammalian-eggs-in-vivo-and-in-vitro-ii-the-development-of-fertilized-and-artificially-activated-rabbit-eggs-by-g-george-pincus, accessed on 07 October 2026

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_w_7_28/letter-from-lancelot-hogben-to-john-david-griffith-davies-regarding-a-paper-the-comparative-behaviour-of-mammalian-eggs-in-vivo-and-in-vitro-ii-the-development-of-fertilized-and-artificially-activated-rabbit-eggs-by-g-george-pincus" title="Letter from Lancelot Hogben to [John David] Griffith Davies, regarding a paper 'The comparative behaviour of mammalian eggs in vivo and in vitro. II. The development of fertilized and artificially activated rabbit eggs' by G [George] Pincus" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Hierarchy

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    Dates: 1832 - 1954

    View collection