Letter from Lancelot Hogben to [John David] Griffith Davies, regarding a paper 'The comparative behaviour of mammalian eggs in vivo and in vitro. II. The development of fertilized and artificially activated rabbit eggs' by G [George] Pincus
Reference number: RR/W/7/28
Date: 10 January 1939
Description
Paper reference code: B.43
Hogben provides extensive criticism of Pincus's writing style, stating that it is below the standard of publication for the Society. Nevertheless he believes the work to be of great importance. 'The figures leave no doubt that we have here a case of genuine mammalian parthenogenesis' and Hogben suggests 'that the Society reconsider it for publication' if Pincus rewrites the paper.
[Not published].
Received
- Reference number
- RR/W/7/28
- Earliest possible date
- 10 January 1939
- Physical description
- Letter on paper
- Page extent
- 3 pages
- Format
- Typescript
Creator names
Lancelot Thomas Hogben
View page for Lancelot Thomas Hogben
Lancelot Thomas Hogben
View page for Lancelot Thomas Hogben
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Lancelot Thomas Hogben, Lancelot Thomas Hogben, Letter from Lancelot Hogben to [John David] Griffith Davies, regarding a paper 'The comparative behaviour of mammalian eggs in vivo and in vitro. II. The development of fertilized and artificially activated rabbit eggs' by G [George] Pincus, 10 January 1939, RR/W/7/28, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_w_7_28/letter-from-lancelot-hogben-to-john-david-griffith-davies-regarding-a-paper-the-comparative-behaviour-of-mammalian-eggs-in-vivo-and-in-vitro-ii-the-development-of-fertilized-and-artificially-activated-rabbit-eggs-by-g-george-pincus, accessed on 07 October 2026
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_w_7_28/letter-from-lancelot-hogben-to-john-david-griffith-davies-regarding-a-paper-the-comparative-behaviour-of-mammalian-eggs-in-vivo-and-in-vitro-ii-the-development-of-fertilized-and-artificially-activated-rabbit-eggs-by-g-george-pincus
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_w_7_28/letter-from-lancelot-hogben-to-john-david-griffith-davies-regarding-a-paper-the-comparative-behaviour-of-mammalian-eggs-in-vivo-and-in-vitro-ii-the-development-of-fertilized-and-artificially-activated-rabbit-eggs-by-g-george-pincus" title="Letter from Lancelot Hogben to [John David] Griffith Davies, regarding a paper 'The comparative behaviour of mammalian eggs in vivo and in vitro. II. The development of fertilized and artificially activated rabbit eggs' by G [George] Pincus" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Related Records
-
Referee's Report by A S [Alan Sterling] Parkes on a paper 'The comparative behaviour of mammalian eggs in vivo and in vitro. II. The development of fertilized and artificially activated rabbit eggs' by G [George] Pincus
Creator: Alan Sterling Parkes, Sir; Alan Sterling Parkes Reference number: RR/W/7/24 -
Letter from J [James] Gray to A V [Archibald Vivian] Hill, regarding a paper 'The comparative behaviour of mammalian eggs in vivo and in vitro. II. The development of fertilized and artificially activated rabbit eggs' by G [George] Pincus
Creator: James Gray, Sir James Gray Reference number: RR/W/7/25 -
Referee's Report by J [James] Gray on a paper 'The comparative behaviour of mammalian eggs in vivo and in vitro. II. The development of fertilized and artificially activated rabbit eggs' by G [George] Pincus
Creator: James Gray, Sir James Gray Reference number: RR/W/7/26 -
Letter from F H A [Francis Hugh Adam] Marshall to [John David] Griffith Davies, regarding a paper 'The comparative behaviour of mammalian eggs in vivo and in vitro. II. The development of fertilized and artificially activated rabbit eggs' by G [George] Pincus
Creator: Francis Hugh Adam Marshall, Francis Hugh Adam Marshall Reference number: RR/W/7/27
Hierarchy
Related Fellows
-
Lancelot Thomas Hogben
Referee
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.
Dates: 1832 - 1954
View collection