Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. It is a 'most valuable work'.

Subject: Physics

[Published in Philosophical Transactions, 1882].

Reference number
RR/9/86
Earliest possible date
23 April 1882
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Thomson

View page for William Thomson

Use this record

Citation

William Thomson, Referee's report by William Thomson, Lord Kelvin, on a paper 'Experiments to determine the value of the British association unit of resistance in absolute measure' by John William Strutt, Lord Rayleigh, 23 April 1882, RR/9/86, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_9_86/referees-report-by-william-thomson-lord-kelvin-on-a-paper-experiments-to-determine-the-value-of-the-british-association-unit-of-resistance-in-absolute-measure-by-john-william-strutt-lord-rayleigh, accessed on 12 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_9_86/referees-report-by-william-thomson-lord-kelvin-on-a-paper-experiments-to-determine-the-value-of-the-british-association-unit-of-resistance-in-absolute-measure-by-john-william-strutt-lord-rayleigh" title="Referee's report by William Thomson, Lord Kelvin, on a paper 'Experiments to determine the value of the British association unit of resistance in absolute measure' by John William Strutt, Lord Rayleigh" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection