Letter from Joseph Henry Gilbert, on his paper 'Agricultural, botanical, and chemical results of experiments on the mixed herbage of permanent meadow, conducted for more than twenty years in succession on the same land. — Part. II. The botanical results' by himself, John Bennet Lawes and Maxwell Tylden Masters to Joseph Dalton Hooker and William Turner Thiselton-Dyer
Reference number: RR/9/60
Date: 03 May 1882
Description
Has read the referee's suggestions but believes them to be 'impracticle' and it cannot be condensed in the way the referees would like it to be.
Subject: Botany
[Published in Philosophical Transactions, 1882].
- Reference number
- RR/9/60
- Earliest possible date
- 03 May 1882
- Physical description
- Letter on paper
- Page extent
- 7 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Letter from Joseph Henry Gilbert, on his paper 'Agricultural, botanical, and chemical results of experiments on the mixed herbage of permanent meadow, conducted for more than twenty years in succession on the same land. — Part. II. The botanical results' by himself, John Bennet Lawes and Maxwell Tylden Masters to Joseph Dalton Hooker and William Turner Thiselton-Dyer, 03 May 1882, RR/9/60, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_9_60/letter-from-joseph-henry-gilbert-on-his-paper-agricultural-botanical-and-chemical-results-of-experiments-on-the-mixed-herbage-of-permanent-meadow-conducted-for-more-than-twenty-years-in-succession-on-the-same-land-part-ii-the-botanical-results-by-himself-john-bennet-lawes-and-maxwell-tylden-masters-to-joseph-dalton-hooker-and-william-turner-thiselton-dyer, accessed on 02 December 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_9_60/letter-from-joseph-henry-gilbert-on-his-paper-agricultural-botanical-and-chemical-results-of-experiments-on-the-mixed-herbage-of-permanent-meadow-conducted-for-more-than-twenty-years-in-succession-on-the-same-land-part-ii-the-botanical-results-by-himself-john-bennet-lawes-and-maxwell-tylden-masters-to-joseph-dalton-hooker-and-william-turner-thiselton-dyer
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_9_60/letter-from-joseph-henry-gilbert-on-his-paper-agricultural-botanical-and-chemical-results-of-experiments-on-the-mixed-herbage-of-permanent-meadow-conducted-for-more-than-twenty-years-in-succession-on-the-same-land-part-ii-the-botanical-results-by-himself-john-bennet-lawes-and-maxwell-tylden-masters-to-joseph-dalton-hooker-and-william-turner-thiselton-dyer" title="Letter from Joseph Henry Gilbert, on his paper 'Agricultural, botanical, and chemical results of experiments on the mixed herbage of permanent meadow, conducted for more than twenty years in succession on the same land. — Part. II. The botanical results' by himself, John Bennet Lawes and Maxwell Tylden Masters to Joseph Dalton Hooker and William Turner Thiselton-Dyer" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Related Publications
Related Records
-
Referee's report by Joseph Dalton Hooker and William Turner Thiselton-Dyer, on a paper 'Agricultural, botanical, and chemical results of experiments on the mixed herbage of permanent meadow, conducted for more than twenty years in succession on the same land. — Part. II. The botanical results' by John Bennet Lawes, J H Gilbert and Maxwell Tylden Masters
Creator: Joseph Dalton Hooker, William Turner Thiselton-Dyer Reference number: RR/9/59
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referee's reports: volume 9, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1882-1887 Reference number: RR/9
Related Fellows
-
Joseph Henry Gilbert
Author -
John Bennet Lawes
Recipient -
Maxwell Tylden Masters
Author -
William Turner Thiselton-Dyer
Recipient
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection