Referee's report by Joseph Dalton Hooker and William Turner Thiselton-Dyer, on a paper 'Agricultural, botanical, and chemical results of experiments on the mixed herbage of permanent meadow, conducted for more than twenty years in succession on the same land. — Part. II. The botanical results' by John Bennet Lawes, J H Gilbert and Maxwell Tylden Masters
Reference number: RR/9/59
Date: 16 March 1882
Description
Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. They have reviewed the paper before and alterations have been made by the authors in accordance with the previous report. It should be published in continuation with their previous paper on this subject. The paper should be condensed in parts and they offer further modifications.
Subject: Botany
[Published in Philosophical Transactions, 1882].
- Reference number
- RR/9/59
- Earliest possible date
- 16 March 1882
- Physical description
- Letter on paper
- Page extent
- 10 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Creator names
Joseph Dalton Hooker
View page for Joseph Dalton HookerWilliam Turner Thiselton-Dyer
View page for William Turner Thiselton-DyerUse this record
Export this record
Citation
Joseph Dalton Hooker, William Turner Thiselton-Dyer, Referee's report by Joseph Dalton Hooker and William Turner Thiselton-Dyer, on a paper 'Agricultural, botanical, and chemical results of experiments on the mixed herbage of permanent meadow, conducted for more than twenty years in succession on the same land. — Part. II. The botanical results' by John Bennet Lawes, J H Gilbert and Maxwell Tylden Masters, 16 March 1882, RR/9/59, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_9_59/referees-report-by-joseph-dalton-hooker-and-william-turner-thiselton-dyer-on-a-paper-agricultural-botanical-and-chemical-results-of-experiments-on-the-mixed-herbage-of-permanent-meadow-conducted-for-more-than-twenty-years-in-succession-on-the-same-land-part-ii-the-botanical-results-by-john-bennet-lawes-j-h-gilbert-and-maxwell-tylden-masters, accessed on 04 November 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_9_59/referees-report-by-joseph-dalton-hooker-and-william-turner-thiselton-dyer-on-a-paper-agricultural-botanical-and-chemical-results-of-experiments-on-the-mixed-herbage-of-permanent-meadow-conducted-for-more-than-twenty-years-in-succession-on-the-same-land-part-ii-the-botanical-results-by-john-bennet-lawes-j-h-gilbert-and-maxwell-tylden-masters
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_9_59/referees-report-by-joseph-dalton-hooker-and-william-turner-thiselton-dyer-on-a-paper-agricultural-botanical-and-chemical-results-of-experiments-on-the-mixed-herbage-of-permanent-meadow-conducted-for-more-than-twenty-years-in-succession-on-the-same-land-part-ii-the-botanical-results-by-john-bennet-lawes-j-h-gilbert-and-maxwell-tylden-masters" title="Referee's report by Joseph Dalton Hooker and William Turner Thiselton-Dyer, on a paper 'Agricultural, botanical, and chemical results of experiments on the mixed herbage of permanent meadow, conducted for more than twenty years in succession on the same land. — Part. II. The botanical results' by John Bennet Lawes, J H Gilbert and Maxwell Tylden Masters" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Related Publications
Related Records
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referee's reports: volume 9, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1882-1887 Reference number: RR/9
Related Fellows
-
Joseph Dalton Hooker
Referee -
William Turner Thiselton-Dyer
Referee -
John Bennet Lawes
Author -
Maxwell Tylden Masters
Author -
Joseph Henry Gilbert
Author
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection