Referee's report by Arthur Cayley, on a paper 'On a tangential property of regular hypoeycloids and epicycloids. (II.) On theorems relating to the regular polyhedra which are analogous to those of Dr. Matthew Stewart on the regular polygons' by Henry Martyn Jeffery
Reference number: RR/9/54
Date: 12 July 1882
Description
Recommended for publication in Proceedings. The paper has 'inaccuracies' and 'a want of proper explanation of the notations'. The papers don't seem to be put together in a 'careful or orderly manner'.
Subject: Mathematics
[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1882].
- Reference number
- RR/9/54
- Earliest possible date
- 12 July 1882
- Physical description
- Report on paper
- Page extent
- 4 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Arthur Cayley, Referee's report by Arthur Cayley, on a paper 'On a tangential property of regular hypoeycloids and epicycloids. (II.) On theorems relating to the regular polyhedra which are analogous to those of Dr. Matthew Stewart on the regular polygons' by Henry Martyn Jeffery, 12 July 1882, RR/9/54, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_9_54/referees-report-by-arthur-cayley-on-a-paper-on-a-tangential-property-of-regular-hypoeycloids-and-epicycloids-ii-on-theorems-relating-to-the-regular-polyhedra-which-are-analogous-to-those-of-dr-matthew-stewart-on-the-regular-polygons-by-henry-martyn-jeffery, accessed on 13 September 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_9_54/referees-report-by-arthur-cayley-on-a-paper-on-a-tangential-property-of-regular-hypoeycloids-and-epicycloids-ii-on-theorems-relating-to-the-regular-polyhedra-which-are-analogous-to-those-of-dr-matthew-stewart-on-the-regular-polygons-by-henry-martyn-jeffery
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_9_54/referees-report-by-arthur-cayley-on-a-paper-on-a-tangential-property-of-regular-hypoeycloids-and-epicycloids-ii-on-theorems-relating-to-the-regular-polyhedra-which-are-analogous-to-those-of-dr-matthew-stewart-on-the-regular-polygons-by-henry-martyn-jeffery" title="Referee's report by Arthur Cayley, on a paper 'On a tangential property of regular hypoeycloids and epicycloids. (II.) On theorems relating to the regular polyhedra which are analogous to those of Dr. Matthew Stewart on the regular polygons' by Henry Martyn Jeffery" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Related Publications
Related Records
-
Letter from Samuel Roberts, on a paper 'On a tangential property of regular hypoeycloids and epicycloids. (II.) On theorems relating to the regular polyhedra which are analogous to those of Dr. Matthew Stewart on the regular polygons' by Henry Martyn Jeffery to the Secretary of the Royal Society
Creator: Samuel Roberts Reference number: RR/9/55 -
Referee's report by Samuel Roberts, on a paper 'On a tangential property of regular hypoeycloids and epicycloids. (II.) On theorems relating to the regular polyhedra which are analogous to those of Dr. Matthew Stewart on the regular polygons' by Henry Martyn Jeffery
Creator: Samuel Roberts Reference number: RR/9/56 -
Referee's report by Arthur Cayley, on a paper 'On a tangential property of regular hypoeycloids and epicycloids. (II.) On theorems relating to the regular polyhedra which are analogous to those of Dr. Matthew Stewart on the regular polygons' by Henry Martyn Jeffery
Creator: Arthur Cayley Reference number: RR/9/57
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referee's reports: volume 9, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1882-1887 Reference number: RR/9
Related Fellows
-
Arthur Cayley
Referee -
Henry Martyn Jeffery
Author
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1949
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection