Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. It is an 'important addition'.

Subject: Zoology

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1887].

Reference number
RR/9/365
Earliest possible date
03 July 1887
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Thomas Henry Huxley

View page for Thomas Henry Huxley

Use this record

Citation

Thomas Henry Huxley, Referee's report by Thomas Henry Huxley, on a paper 'Supplementary note on Polacanthus Foxii, describing the dorsal and some parts of the endoskeleton imperfectly known in 1881' by John Whitaker Hulke, 03 July 1887, RR/9/365, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_9_365/referees-report-by-thomas-henry-huxley-on-a-paper-supplementary-note-on-polacanthus-foxii-describing-the-dorsal-and-some-parts-of-the-endoskeleton-imperfectly-known-in-1881-by-john-whitaker-hulke, accessed on 13 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_9_365/referees-report-by-thomas-henry-huxley-on-a-paper-supplementary-note-on-polacanthus-foxii-describing-the-dorsal-and-some-parts-of-the-endoskeleton-imperfectly-known-in-1881-by-john-whitaker-hulke" title="Referee's report by Thomas Henry Huxley, on a paper 'Supplementary note on Polacanthus Foxii, describing the dorsal and some parts of the endoskeleton imperfectly known in 1881' by John Whitaker Hulke" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection