Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. It is 'certainly sufficiently valuable'. The paper is of a 'suggestive' nature. It would perhaps be better placed in Proceedings, as as this journal is 'more readily referred to than the Transactions'. The Committee should decide whether this should be the case.

Subject: Physics

[Published in Philosophical Transactions, 1886].

Reference number
RR/9/351
Earliest possible date
20 April 1886
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

John Perry

View page for John Perry

Use this record

Citation

John Perry, Referee's report by John Perry, on a paper 'Effects of stress and magnetisation on the thermoelectric quality of iron' by James Alfred Ewing, 20 April 1886, RR/9/351, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_9_351/referees-report-by-john-perry-on-a-paper-effects-of-stress-and-magnetisation-on-the-thermoelectric-quality-of-iron-by-james-alfred-ewing, accessed on 13 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_9_351/referees-report-by-john-perry-on-a-paper-effects-of-stress-and-magnetisation-on-the-thermoelectric-quality-of-iron-by-james-alfred-ewing" title="Referee's report by John Perry, on a paper 'Effects of stress and magnetisation on the thermoelectric quality of iron' by James Alfred Ewing" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection