Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. The author should add results that have been obtained with his machine, as the value of the paper depends 'entirely on the question of accuracy'.

Subject: Mathematics

[Published in Philosophical Transactions, 1885].

Reference number
RR/9/310
Earliest possible date
25 July 1884
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Osborne Reynolds

View page for Osborne Reynolds

Use this record

Citation

Osborne Reynolds, Referee's report by Osborne Reynolds, on a paper 'The theory of continuous calculating machines and of a mechanism of this class on a new principle' by Henry Selby Hele Shaw, 25 July 1884, RR/9/310, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_9_310/referees-report-by-osborne-reynolds-on-a-paper-the-theory-of-continuous-calculating-machines-and-of-a-mechanism-of-this-class-on-a-new-principle-by-henry-selby-hele-shaw, accessed on 20 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_9_310/referees-report-by-osborne-reynolds-on-a-paper-the-theory-of-continuous-calculating-machines-and-of-a-mechanism-of-this-class-on-a-new-principle-by-henry-selby-hele-shaw" title="Referee's report by Osborne Reynolds, on a paper 'The theory of continuous calculating machines and of a mechanism of this class on a new principle' by Henry Selby Hele Shaw" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection