Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Edward Albert Schafer, on a paper 'The influence of bodily labour upon the discharge of nitrogen' by W North

Reference number: RR/9/295

Date: 15 January 1885

Description

Will confer with Arthur Gamgee on the paper before coming to a decision regarding publication.

Subject: Chemistry

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1885].

Reference number
RR/9/295
Earliest possible date
15 January 1885
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Edward Albert Sharpey-Schafer

View page for Edward Albert Sharpey-Schafer

Use this record

Citation

Edward Albert Sharpey-Schafer, Referee's report by Edward Albert Schafer, on a paper 'The influence of bodily labour upon the discharge of nitrogen' by W North, 15 January 1885, RR/9/295, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_9_295/referees-report-by-edward-albert-schafer-on-a-paper-the-influence-of-bodily-labour-upon-the-discharge-of-nitrogen-by-w-north, accessed on 28 February 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_9_295/referees-report-by-edward-albert-schafer-on-a-paper-the-influence-of-bodily-labour-upon-the-discharge-of-nitrogen-by-w-north" title="Referee's report by Edward Albert Schafer, on a paper 'The influence of bodily labour upon the discharge of nitrogen' by W North" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection