Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. The first part of the paper could be sufficiently covered by an abstract in the Proceedings. The second part should be printed fully in the Proceedings.

Subject: Physics and Chemistry, Applied Sciences

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London', 1882]

Reference number
RR/8/295
Earliest possible date
01 July 1881
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
6 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Frederick Augustus Abel

View page for Frederick Augustus Abel

Use this record

Citation

Frederick Augustus Abel, Referee's report by Frederick Augustus Abel, on a paper 'On the influence of coal-dust in colliery explosions. No. III' by W Galloway, 01 July 1881, RR/8/295, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_8_295/referees-report-by-frederick-augustus-abel-on-a-paper-on-the-influence-of-coal-dust-in-colliery-explosions-no-iii-by-w-galloway, accessed on 19 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_8_295/referees-report-by-frederick-augustus-abel-on-a-paper-on-the-influence-of-coal-dust-in-colliery-explosions-no-iii-by-w-galloway" title="Referee's report by Frederick Augustus Abel, on a paper 'On the influence of coal-dust in colliery explosions. No. III' by W Galloway" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection