Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Charles Watkins Merrifield, on a paper 'English reproduction table' by William Farr

Reference number: RR/8/223

Date: 25 February 1880

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society', on account of the tables, although has had some doubt as to whether the Proceedings would be more suitable.

Subject: Mathematics

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1880]

Reference number
RR/8/223
Earliest possible date
25 February 1880
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Charles Watkins Merrifield

View page for Charles Watkins Merrifield

Use this record

Citation

Charles Watkins Merrifield, Referee's report by Charles Watkins Merrifield, on a paper 'English reproduction table' by William Farr, 25 February 1880, RR/8/223, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_8_223/referees-report-by-charles-watkins-merrifield-on-a-paper-english-reproduction-table-by-william-farr, accessed on 25 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_8_223/referees-report-by-charles-watkins-merrifield-on-a-paper-english-reproduction-table-by-william-farr" title="Referee's report by Charles Watkins Merrifield, on a paper 'English reproduction table' by William Farr" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection