Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Edwin Ray Lankester, on a paper 'Concluding observations on the locomotor system of medusae' by George John Romanes

Reference number: RR/8/197

Date: 06 October 1879

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'.

Subject: Zoology, Physiology

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1880]

Reference number
RR/8/197
Earliest possible date
06 October 1879
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Edwin Ray Lankester

View page for Edwin Ray Lankester

Use this record

Citation

Edwin Ray Lankester, Referee's report by Edwin Ray Lankester, on a paper 'Concluding observations on the locomotor system of medusae' by George John Romanes, 06 October 1879, RR/8/197, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_8_197/referees-report-by-edwin-ray-lankester-on-a-paper-concluding-observations-on-the-locomotor-system-of-medusae-by-george-john-romanes, accessed on 25 February 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_8_197/referees-report-by-edwin-ray-lankester-on-a-paper-concluding-observations-on-the-locomotor-system-of-medusae-by-george-john-romanes" title="Referee's report by Edwin Ray Lankester, on a paper 'Concluding observations on the locomotor system of medusae' by George John Romanes" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection