Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. The paper is a continuation of earlier researches published in the Philosophical Transactions by the same authors. Suggests the addition of a table of contents.

Subject: Mathematics, Applied Sciences, Physics and Chemistry

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1880]

Reference number
RR/8/176
Earliest possible date
15 August 1879
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

John Hall Gladstone

View page for John Hall Gladstone

Use this record

Citation

John Hall Gladstone, Referee's report by John Hall Gladstone, on a paper 'Researches on explosives. No. II.—Fired gunpowder' by Andrew Noble and Frederick Augustus Abel, 15 August 1879, RR/8/176, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_8_176/referees-report-by-john-hall-gladstone-on-a-paper-researches-on-explosives-no-iifired-gunpowder-by-andrew-noble-and-frederick-augustus-abel, accessed on 16 April 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_8_176/referees-report-by-john-hall-gladstone-on-a-paper-researches-on-explosives-no-iifired-gunpowder-by-andrew-noble-and-frederick-augustus-abel" title="Referee's report by John Hall Gladstone, on a paper 'Researches on explosives. No. II.—Fired gunpowder' by Andrew Noble and Frederick Augustus Abel" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection