Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Not recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society', suggests publication in the Proceedings if the original curves can be supplied.

Subject: Physics and Chemistry, Physiology

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London', 1879]

Reference number
RR/8/163
Earliest possible date
09 August 1879
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

John Scott Burdon-Sanderson

View page for John Scott Burdon-Sanderson

Use this record

Citation

John Scott Burdon-Sanderson, Referee's report by John Scott Burdon-Sanderson, on a paper 'On the effects of chloroform and ether on the radial tracing' by Charles Handfield Jones, 09 August 1879, RR/8/163, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_8_163/referees-report-by-john-scott-burdon-sanderson-on-a-paper-on-the-effects-of-chloroform-and-ether-on-the-radial-tracing-by-charles-handfield-jones, accessed on 12 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_8_163/referees-report-by-john-scott-burdon-sanderson-on-a-paper-on-the-effects-of-chloroform-and-ether-on-the-radial-tracing-by-charles-handfield-jones" title="Referee's report by John Scott Burdon-Sanderson, on a paper 'On the effects of chloroform and ether on the radial tracing' by Charles Handfield Jones" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection