Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. The paper may be more suited for the Proceedings, but the illustrations are much better suited for the Philosophical Transactions.

Subject: Physiology

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1878]

Reference number
RR/8/113
Earliest possible date
01 June 1878
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

John Lubbock

View page for John Lubbock

Use this record

Citation

John Lubbock, Second referee's report by John Lubbock, 1st Baron Avebury, on a paper 'On the modifications of the simple and compound eyes of insects' by Benjamin Thompson Lowne, 01 June 1878, RR/8/113, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_8_113/second-referees-report-by-john-lubbock-1st-baron-avebury-on-a-paper-on-the-modifications-of-the-simple-and-compound-eyes-of-insects-by-benjamin-thompson-lowne, accessed on 21 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_8_113/second-referees-report-by-john-lubbock-1st-baron-avebury-on-a-paper-on-the-modifications-of-the-simple-and-compound-eyes-of-insects-by-benjamin-thompson-lowne" title="Second referee's report by John Lubbock, 1st Baron Avebury, on a paper 'On the modifications of the simple and compound eyes of insects' by Benjamin Thompson Lowne" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection