Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Maxwell Tylden Masters, on a paper 'On the leaf-arrangement of the crowberry (empetrum nigrum)' by Hubert Airy

Reference number: RR/7/432

Date: 24 July 1876

Description

Recommended for publication in Proceedings. The paper 'contains an ingenious attempt to explain irregularities in the arrangement of the leaves'.

Subject: Botany

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1876].

Reference number
RR/7/432
Earliest possible date
24 July 1876
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Maxwell Tylden Masters

View page for Maxwell Tylden Masters

Use this record

Citation

Maxwell Tylden Masters, Referee's report by Maxwell Tylden Masters, on a paper 'On the leaf-arrangement of the crowberry (empetrum nigrum)' by Hubert Airy, 24 July 1876, RR/7/432, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_7_432/referees-report-by-maxwell-tylden-masters-on-a-paper-on-the-leaf-arrangement-of-the-crowberry-empetrum-nigrum-by-hubert-airy, accessed on 22 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_7_432/referees-report-by-maxwell-tylden-masters-on-a-paper-on-the-leaf-arrangement-of-the-crowberry-empetrum-nigrum-by-hubert-airy" title="Referee's report by Maxwell Tylden Masters, on a paper 'On the leaf-arrangement of the crowberry (empetrum nigrum)' by Hubert Airy" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection