Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Not recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions,as it would be better placed in the Proceedings. The results are 'of unquestionable importance' but 'the investigation is not complete'.

Subject: Physiology

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1877].

Reference number
RR/7/324
Earliest possible date
13 December 1874
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

John Scott Burdon-Sanderson

View page for John Scott Burdon-Sanderson

Use this record

Citation

John Scott Burdon-Sanderson, Referee's report by John Scott Burdon-Sanderson, on a paper 'On the physiological action of the chinoline and pyridine bases' by John Gray McKendrick and James Dewar, 13 December 1874, RR/7/324, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_7_324/referees-report-by-john-scott-burdon-sanderson-on-a-paper-on-the-physiological-action-of-the-chinoline-and-pyridine-bases-by-john-gray-mckendrick-and-james-dewar, accessed on 13 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_7_324/referees-report-by-john-scott-burdon-sanderson-on-a-paper-on-the-physiological-action-of-the-chinoline-and-pyridine-bases-by-john-gray-mckendrick-and-james-dewar" title="Referee's report by John Scott Burdon-Sanderson, on a paper 'On the physiological action of the chinoline and pyridine bases' by John Gray McKendrick and James Dewar" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection