Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. The 'data it yields are not of sufficient importance to merit it's publication in the Phil[osophical] Trans[actions]' but the general conclusions are 'entirely so'. It should also be published in the Proceedings for the time being.

Subject: Physiology

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1874].

Reference number
RR/7/323
Earliest possible date
09 October 1874
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

George Harley

View page for George Harley

Use this record

Citation

George Harley, Referee's report by George Harley, on a paper 'On the physiological action of the chinoline and pyridine bases' by John Gray McKendrick and James Dewar, 09 October 1874, RR/7/323, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_7_323/referees-report-by-george-harley-on-a-paper-on-the-physiological-action-of-the-chinoline-and-pyridine-bases-by-john-gray-mckendrick-and-james-dewar, accessed on 19 June 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_7_323/referees-report-by-george-harley-on-a-paper-on-the-physiological-action-of-the-chinoline-and-pyridine-bases-by-john-gray-mckendrick-and-james-dewar" title="Referee's report by George Harley, on a paper 'On the physiological action of the chinoline and pyridine bases' by John Gray McKendrick and James Dewar" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection