Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Referee's report by Philip Des Malpas Grey Egerton, on a paper 'On the fossil mammals of Australia - Part VI. Genus phascolomys' by Richard Owen

Reference number: RR/7/189

Date: 29 May 1872

Description

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions.

Subject: Zoology

[Published in Philosophical Transactions, 1862].

Reference number
RR/7/189
Earliest possible date
29 May 1872
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Philip de Malpas Grey Egerton

View page for Philip de Malpas Grey Egerton

Use this record

Citation

Philip de Malpas Grey Egerton, Referee's report by Philip Des Malpas Grey Egerton, on a paper 'On the fossil mammals of Australia - Part VI. Genus phascolomys' by Richard Owen, 29 May 1872, RR/7/189, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_7_189/referees-report-by-philip-des-malpas-grey-egerton-on-a-paper-on-the-fossil-mammals-of-australia-part-vi-genus-phascolomys-by-richard-owen, accessed on 15 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_7_189/referees-report-by-philip-des-malpas-grey-egerton-on-a-paper-on-the-fossil-mammals-of-australia-part-vi-genus-phascolomys-by-richard-owen" title="Referee's report by Philip Des Malpas Grey Egerton, on a paper 'On the fossil mammals of Australia - Part VI. Genus phascolomys' by Richard Owen" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection