Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Further remarks on his previous report.

Subject: Zoology

[Published in Philosophical Transactions, 1871].

Reference number
RR/7/126
Earliest possible date
27 March 1871
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Philip de Malpas Grey Egerton

View page for Philip de Malpas Grey Egerton

Use this record

Citation

Philip de Malpas Grey Egerton, Letter from Philip de Malpas Grey Egerton, on a paper 'On the fossil mammals of Australia.—Part IV. Dentition and mandible of thylacoleo carnifex, with remarks on the arguments for its herbivority' by Richard Owen, 27 March 1871, RR/7/126, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_7_126/letter-from-philip-de-malpas-grey-egerton-on-a-paper-on-the-fossil-mammals-of-australiapart-iv-dentition-and-mandible-of-thylacoleo-carnifex-with-remarks-on-the-arguments-for-its-herbivority-by-richard-owen, accessed on 23 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_7_126/letter-from-philip-de-malpas-grey-egerton-on-a-paper-on-the-fossil-mammals-of-australiapart-iv-dentition-and-mandible-of-thylacoleo-carnifex-with-remarks-on-the-arguments-for-its-herbivority-by-richard-owen" title="Letter from Philip de Malpas Grey Egerton, on a paper 'On the fossil mammals of Australia.—Part IV. Dentition and mandible of thylacoleo carnifex, with remarks on the arguments for its herbivority' by Richard Owen" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection