Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Paper reference code: B58

Believes there is no need for a third referee for the paper, as 'it was first class work'.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1953].

Received 20 December 1952.

Reference number
RR/78/82
Earliest possible date
19 December 1952
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
1 page
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Frederic Wood Jones

View page for Frederic Wood Jones

Use this record

Citation

Frederic Wood Jones, Letter from Frederic Wood Jones, on a paper 'Studies of the carotid rete and its associated arteries' by P M Daniel, J D K Dawes and Marjorie M L Prichard, to Sir Edward [Salisbury], 19 December 1952, RR/78/82, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_78_82/letter-from-frederic-wood-jones-on-a-paper-studies-of-the-carotid-rete-and-its-associated-arteries-by-p-m-daniel-j-d-k-dawes-and-marjorie-m-l-prichard-to-sir-edward-salisbury, accessed on 03 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_78_82/letter-from-frederic-wood-jones-on-a-paper-studies-of-the-carotid-rete-and-its-associated-arteries-by-p-m-daniel-j-d-k-dawes-and-marjorie-m-l-prichard-to-sir-edward-salisbury" title="Letter from Frederic Wood Jones, on a paper 'Studies of the carotid rete and its associated arteries' by P M Daniel, J D K Dawes and Marjorie M L Prichard, to Sir Edward [Salisbury]" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection