Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physics

Paper reference code: A151

Not recommended for publication in its present form. Suggests the major part would be suited for publication as a critical review such as Progress in Physics or Quarterly Reviews of the Chemical Society. The original content and the experimental work could be condensed for the Proceedings.

[Published in Proceedings A, 1953].

Date received not given.

Reference number
RR/77/172
Earliest possible date
22 September 1952
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Typescript

Creator name

Douglas Hugh Everett

View page for Douglas Hugh Everett

Use this record

Citation

Douglas Hugh Everett, Referee's report by Douglas Hugh Everett, on a paper 'The irreversible transformation in glasses' by R O Davies and G O Jones, 22 September 1952, RR/77/172, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_77_172/referees-report-by-douglas-hugh-everett-on-a-paper-the-irreversible-transformation-in-glasses-by-r-o-davies-and-g-o-jones, accessed on 04 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_77_172/referees-report-by-douglas-hugh-everett-on-a-paper-the-irreversible-transformation-in-glasses-by-r-o-davies-and-g-o-jones" title="Referee's report by Douglas Hugh Everett, on a paper 'The irreversible transformation in glasses' by R O Davies and G O Jones" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection