Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Has had difficulty coming to a conclusion. The conclusions are on considerable interest but the author should discuss the implications of the conclusions.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1949].

Endorsed on recto as received 22 February 1949.

Reference number
RR/72/164
Earliest possible date
20 February 1949
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
1 page
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Edward Garner

View page for William Edward Garner

Use this record

Citation

William Edward Garner, Letter from William Edward Garner, on a paper 'The ignition of solid explosive media by hot wires' by E Jones to D C Martin, Assistant Secretary of the Royal Society, 20 February 1949, RR/72/164, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_72_164/letter-from-william-edward-garner-on-a-paper-the-ignition-of-solid-explosive-media-by-hot-wires-by-e-jones-to-d-c-martin-assistant-secretary-of-the-royal-society, accessed on 10 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_72_164/letter-from-william-edward-garner-on-a-paper-the-ignition-of-solid-explosive-media-by-hot-wires-by-e-jones-to-d-c-martin-assistant-secretary-of-the-royal-society" title="Letter from William Edward Garner, on a paper 'The ignition of solid explosive media by hot wires' by E Jones to D C Martin, Assistant Secretary of the Royal Society" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection