Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Botany

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. There is some repetition in the discussion and it could be shortened.

Apologises for returning the paper late, as it arrived when he was away from Cambridge.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1949].

Endorsed on recto as received 6 May 1948.

Reference number
RR/71/272
Earliest possible date
06 May 1948
Physical description
Standardised form (type E) and letter on paper
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Ernest John Maskell

View page for Ernest John Maskell

Use this record

Citation

Ernest John Maskell, Referee's report by Ernest John Maskell, on a paper 'Further experimental investigations of the shoot apex of Dryopteris aristata Druce' by C W Wardlaw, 06 May 1948, RR/71/272, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_71_272/referees-report-by-ernest-john-maskell-on-a-paper-further-experimental-investigations-of-the-shoot-apex-of-dryopteris-aristata-druce-by-c-w-wardlaw, accessed on 18 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_71_272/referees-report-by-ernest-john-maskell-on-a-paper-further-experimental-investigations-of-the-shoot-apex-of-dryopteris-aristata-druce-by-c-w-wardlaw" title="Referee's report by Ernest John Maskell, on a paper 'Further experimental investigations of the shoot apex of Dryopteris aristata Druce' by C W Wardlaw" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection