Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Mathematics

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Was an external examiner for the paper when it was submitted as a PhD thesis. The paper is clear and well written, but very long and should be shortened, but cannot make definite suggestions for doing this. Provides detailed criticism of the mathematics. Suggests discussing potential shortening with the author or Rudolf Ernst Peierls.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

No received date.

Reference number
RR/71/199
Earliest possible date
1948
Physical description
Standardised form (type E) and letter on paper
Page extent
5 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Max Born

View page for Max Born

Use this record

Citation

Max Born, Referee's report by Max Born, on a paper 'Classical electrodynamics without singularities' by H McManus, 1948, RR/71/199, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_71_199/referees-report-by-max-born-on-a-paper-classical-electrodynamics-without-singularities-by-h-mcmanus, accessed on 11 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_71_199/referees-report-by-max-born-on-a-paper-classical-electrodynamics-without-singularities-by-h-mcmanus" title="Referee's report by Max Born, on a paper 'Classical electrodynamics without singularities' by H McManus" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection