Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Chemistry

Recommended for publication in Proceedings. The experimental work is of as high standard and the conclusions seem convincing and important.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1940].

Date received not given.

Reference number
RR/70/15
Earliest possible date
1947
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
1 page
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Cecil Henry Desch

View page for Cecil Henry Desch

Use this record

Citation

Cecil Henry Desch, Referee's report by Cecil Henry Desch, on a paper 'The lattice spacings of solid solutions of different elements in aluminium' by H J Axon and William Hume-Rothery, 1947, RR/70/15, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_70_15/referees-report-by-cecil-henry-desch-on-a-paper-the-lattice-spacings-of-solid-solutions-of-different-elements-in-aluminium-by-h-j-axon-and-william-hume-rothery, accessed on 02 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_70_15/referees-report-by-cecil-henry-desch-on-a-paper-the-lattice-spacings-of-solid-solutions-of-different-elements-in-aluminium-by-h-j-axon-and-william-hume-rothery" title="Referee's report by Cecil Henry Desch, on a paper 'The lattice spacings of solid solutions of different elements in aluminium' by H J Axon and William Hume-Rothery" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection