Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Engineering sciences

Recommended for publication in Proceedings. Doesn't agree with the previous referee that the papers are too specialised for publication by the Society. The diagrams should be reduced in size. The results are interesting and the papers are valuable.

[All papers published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1948].

Date received not given.

Reference number
RR/70/147
Earliest possible date
1947
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
1 page
Format
Typescript

Creator name

Cecil Henry Desch

View page for Cecil Henry Desch

Use this record

Citation

Cecil Henry Desch, Referee's report by Cecil Henry Desch, on three papers 'Binary and ternary interstitial alloys. Parts I, II and III' by Kenneth Henderson Jack, 1947, RR/70/147, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_70_147/referees-report-by-cecil-henry-desch-on-three-papers-binary-and-ternary-interstitial-alloys-parts-i-ii-and-iii-by-kenneth-henderson-jack, accessed on 02 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_70_147/referees-report-by-cecil-henry-desch-on-three-papers-binary-and-ternary-interstitial-alloys-parts-i-ii-and-iii-by-kenneth-henderson-jack" title="Referee's report by Cecil Henry Desch, on three papers 'Binary and ternary interstitial alloys. Parts I, II and III' by Kenneth Henderson Jack" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection