Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Not recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. The paper forms a sequel to two papers published in the Natural History Review by the same author. Refers to works by Georges Cuvier, Richard Owen and Hugh Falconer, Balsamo Crivelli and Emilio Cornalia.

Subject: Geology, Palaeontology

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Reference number
RR/6/95
Earliest possible date
21 October 1866
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
6 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

George Busk

View page for George Busk

Use this record

Citation

George Busk, Referee's report by George Busk, on a paper 'On the dentition of Rhinoceros leptorhinus (Owen)' by William Boyd Dawkins, 21 October 1866, RR/6/95, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_6_95/referees-report-by-george-busk-on-a-paper-on-the-dentition-of-rhinoceros-leptorhinus-owen-by-william-boyd-dawkins, accessed on 25 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_6_95/referees-report-by-george-busk-on-a-paper-on-the-dentition-of-rhinoceros-leptorhinus-owen-by-william-boyd-dawkins" title="Referee's report by George Busk, on a paper 'On the dentition of Rhinoceros leptorhinus (Owen)' by William Boyd Dawkins" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection