Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Not recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. The paper is a sequel to two other papers published in the Natural History Review by the same author. Papers regarding anatomical description should be of a wider scope than the current paper to be worthy of inclusion in the Philosophical Transactions. Suggests the paper is more suited to a journal specialising in palaeontological research.

Subject: Geology, Palaeontology

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Reference number
RR/6/94
Earliest possible date
01 October 1866
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Henry Flower

View page for William Henry Flower

Use this record

Citation

William Henry Flower, Referee's report by William Henry Flower, on a paper 'On the dentition of Rhinoceros leptorhinus (Owen)' by William Boyd Dawkins, 01 October 1866, RR/6/94, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_6_94/referees-report-by-william-henry-flower-on-a-paper-on-the-dentition-of-rhinoceros-leptorhinus-owen-by-william-boyd-dawkins, accessed on 17 February 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_6_94/referees-report-by-william-henry-flower-on-a-paper-on-the-dentition-of-rhinoceros-leptorhinus-owen-by-william-boyd-dawkins" title="Referee's report by William Henry Flower, on a paper 'On the dentition of Rhinoceros leptorhinus (Owen)' by William Boyd Dawkins" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection