Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Not recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Considers that the illustrations are not worth the cost. Does not consider himself knowledgeable on the subject from an analytical standpoint, and suggests the paper be referred to someone else, such as Henry Perigal or Joseph Jopling.

Subject: Mathematics

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Reference number
RR/6/258
Earliest possible date
28 July 1869
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Robert Willis

View page for Robert Willis

Use this record

Citation

Robert Willis, Referee's report by Robert Willis, on a paper 'On the mechanical description of curves' by William Henry Leighton Russell, 28 July 1869, RR/6/258, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_6_258/referees-report-by-robert-willis-on-a-paper-on-the-mechanical-description-of-curves-by-william-henry-leighton-russell, accessed on 13 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_6_258/referees-report-by-robert-willis-on-a-paper-on-the-mechanical-description-of-curves-by-william-henry-leighton-russell" title="Referee's report by Robert Willis, on a paper 'On the mechanical description of curves' by William Henry Leighton Russell" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection