Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. Suggests more examination be undertaken to confirm the author's conclusions.

Subject: Physiology

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Reference number
RR/6/227
Earliest possible date
30 August 1867
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
4 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Scovell Savory

View page for William Scovell Savory

Use this record

Citation

William Scovell Savory, Referee's report by William Scovell Savory, on a paper 'On the distribution of the fibres in the muscular tunics of the stomach in man and other mammalia' by James Bell Pettigrew, 30 August 1867, RR/6/227, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_6_227/referees-report-by-william-scovell-savory-on-a-paper-on-the-distribution-of-the-fibres-in-the-muscular-tunics-of-the-stomach-in-man-and-other-mammalia-by-james-bell-pettigrew, accessed on 29 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_6_227/referees-report-by-william-scovell-savory-on-a-paper-on-the-distribution-of-the-fibres-in-the-muscular-tunics-of-the-stomach-in-man-and-other-mammalia-by-james-bell-pettigrew" title="Referee's report by William Scovell Savory, on a paper 'On the distribution of the fibres in the muscular tunics of the stomach in man and other mammalia' by James Bell Pettigrew" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection