Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Recommended for publication in the 'Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society'. However, the recommendation is hesitating, as the paper does not add much of material value to the subject. Refers to work by Rutimeger [?]. Suggests some of the specimens used are not illustrative of the species named. Refers to work of Pierre Toussaint Marcel de Serres de Mesplès.

Subject: Zoology, Palaeontology, Geology

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Reference number
RR/6/207
Earliest possible date
18 April 1869
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
9 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

George Busk

View page for George Busk

Use this record

Citation

George Busk, Referee's report by George Busk, on a paper 'Description of the cavern of Bruniquel, and its organic contents.—Part II. Equine remains' by Richard Owen, 18 April 1869, RR/6/207, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_6_207/referees-report-by-george-busk-on-a-paper-description-of-the-cavern-of-bruniquel-and-its-organic-contentspart-ii-equine-remains-by-richard-owen, accessed on 15 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_6_207/referees-report-by-george-busk-on-a-paper-description-of-the-cavern-of-bruniquel-and-its-organic-contentspart-ii-equine-remains-by-richard-owen" title="Referee's report by George Busk, on a paper 'Description of the cavern of Bruniquel, and its organic contents.—Part II. Equine remains' by Richard Owen" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection