Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Asks if the paper should be recommended for publication and if needed, what other referees should be used.

Proudman replies that if Dirac considers the paper suitable, another referee is not necessary.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1947].

Reference number
RR/69/62
Earliest possible date
27 August 1946
Physical description
Memorandum on paper
Page extent
1 page
Format
Manuscript
Typescript

Use this record

Citation

Memorandum from J D Griffith Davies, Assistant Secretary of the Royal Society, on a paper 'Infinite irreducible representations of the Lorentz group' by Harish-Chandra to Joseph Proudman, 27 August 1946, RR/69/62, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_69_62/memorandum-from-j-d-griffith-davies-assistant-secretary-of-the-royal-society-on-a-paper-infinite-irreducible-representations-of-the-lorentz-group-by-harish-chandra-to-joseph-proudman, accessed on 15 April 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_69_62/memorandum-from-j-d-griffith-davies-assistant-secretary-of-the-royal-society-on-a-paper-infinite-irreducible-representations-of-the-lorentz-group-by-harish-chandra-to-joseph-proudman" title="Memorandum from J D Griffith Davies, Assistant Secretary of the Royal Society, on a paper 'Infinite irreducible representations of the Lorentz group' by Harish-Chandra to Joseph Proudman" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection