Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Chemistry

Both papers recommended for publication in Proceedings. The work seems to be of 'exceptionally high quality'. An expert should report on the statistical calculations in the second paper.

[Both papers published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 1946].

Date received not given.

Reference number
RR/69/194
Earliest possible date
1945
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
1 page
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Neil Kensington Adam

View page for Neil Kensington Adam

Use this record

Citation

Neil Kensington Adam, Referee's report by Neil Kensington Adam, on two papers 'The adsorption of vapours on mercury. Parts I and II' by Charles Kemball and Eric Keightley Rideal, 1945, RR/69/194, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_69_194/referees-report-by-neil-kensington-adam-on-two-papers-the-adsorption-of-vapours-on-mercury-parts-i-and-ii-by-charles-kemball-and-eric-keightley-rideal, accessed on 14 September 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_69_194/referees-report-by-neil-kensington-adam-on-two-papers-the-adsorption-of-vapours-on-mercury-parts-i-and-ii-by-charles-kemball-and-eric-keightley-rideal" title="Referee's report by Neil Kensington Adam, on two papers 'The adsorption of vapours on mercury. Parts I and II' by Charles Kemball and Eric Keightley Rideal" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection