Referee's report by Walter Stanley Stiles, on a paper 'The micro-stimulation of the human retina' by Hamilton Hartridge
Reference number: RR/69/156
Date: 1946
Description
Sectional committee: Physiology
Lists modifications that are required.
[Not published].
Date received not given.
- Reference number
- RR/69/156
- Earliest possible date
- 1946
- Physical description
- Standardised form (type E) and note on paper
- Page extent
- 2 pages
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Walter Stanley Stiles, Referee's report by Walter Stanley Stiles, on a paper 'The micro-stimulation of the human retina' by Hamilton Hartridge, 1946, RR/69/156, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_69_156/referees-report-by-walter-stanley-stiles-on-a-paper-the-micro-stimulation-of-the-human-retina-by-hamilton-hartridge, accessed on 14 December 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_69_156/referees-report-by-walter-stanley-stiles-on-a-paper-the-micro-stimulation-of-the-human-retina-by-hamilton-hartridge
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_69_156/referees-report-by-walter-stanley-stiles-on-a-paper-the-micro-stimulation-of-the-human-retina-by-hamilton-hartridge" title="Referee's report by Walter Stanley Stiles, on a paper 'The micro-stimulation of the human retina' by Hamilton Hartridge" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 69, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1945-1946 Reference number: RR/69
Related Fellows
-
Walter Stanley Stiles
Referee -
Hamilton Hartridge
Author
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection