Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physiology

The observations are of varying quality and conditions are not adequately described. The hypotheses is taken for granted in stating results of the experiments. The terms for colour that are generally accepted are used throughout the paper in a different sense, without adequate explanation of why.

[Not published].

Date received not given.

Reference number
RR/69/147
Earliest possible date
1945
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
3 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Walter Stanley Stiles

View page for Walter Stanley Stiles

Use this record

Citation

Walter Stanley Stiles, Referee's report by Walter Stanley Stiles, on a paper 'The anti-chromatic response, part I' by Hamilton Hartridge, 1945, RR/69/147, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_69_147/referees-report-by-walter-stanley-stiles-on-a-paper-the-anti-chromatic-response-part-i-by-hamilton-hartridge, accessed on 14 May 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_69_147/referees-report-by-walter-stanley-stiles-on-a-paper-the-anti-chromatic-response-part-i-by-hamilton-hartridge" title="Referee's report by Walter Stanley Stiles, on a paper 'The anti-chromatic response, part I' by Hamilton Hartridge" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    Dates: 1832 - 1954

    View collection