Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Physics

Both papers recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. The author should indicate what problem he is dealing with in the abstracts and introductions of the papers. The mathematical work is 'very competent and powerful' throughout.

[Both papers published in Philosophical Transactions A, 1947].

Date received not given.

Reference number
RR/69/135
Earliest possible date
16 March 1947
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
1 page
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

George Frederick James Temple

View page for George Frederick James Temple

Use this record

Citation

George Frederick James Temple, Referee's report by George Frederick James Temple, on two papers 'Linearized supersonic aerofoil theory parts I and II' by J C Gunn, 16 March 1947, RR/69/135, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_69_135/referees-report-by-george-frederick-james-temple-on-two-papers-linearized-supersonic-aerofoil-theory-parts-i-and-ii-by-j-c-gunn, accessed on 15 February 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_69_135/referees-report-by-george-frederick-james-temple-on-two-papers-linearized-supersonic-aerofoil-theory-parts-i-and-ii-by-j-c-gunn" title="Referee's report by George Frederick James Temple, on two papers 'Linearized supersonic aerofoil theory parts I and II' by J C Gunn" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection