Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Would like him to suggest a zoologist for the paper. Asks if he will be willing to pass the paper if the report is favourable.

Gray replies that Wigglesworth is a much more suitable referee.

[Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 1947].

Endorsed on recto as received 21 September 1945.

Reference number
RR/69/106
Earliest possible date
19 September 1945
Physical description
Memorandum on paper
Page extent
1 page
Format
Manuscript
Typescript

Use this record

Citation

Memorandum from J D Griffith Davies, Assistant Secretary of the Royal Society, on a paper 'The structure of insect cuticles' by G Fraenkel and K M Rudall to James Gray, 19 September 1945, RR/69/106, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_69_106/memorandum-from-j-d-griffith-davies-assistant-secretary-of-the-royal-society-on-a-paper-the-structure-of-insect-cuticles-by-g-fraenkel-and-k-m-rudall-to-james-gray, accessed on 03 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_69_106/memorandum-from-j-d-griffith-davies-assistant-secretary-of-the-royal-society-on-a-paper-the-structure-of-insect-cuticles-by-g-fraenkel-and-k-m-rudall-to-james-gray" title="Memorandum from J D Griffith Davies, Assistant Secretary of the Royal Society, on a paper 'The structure of insect cuticles' by G Fraenkel and K M Rudall to James Gray" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection