Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Mathematics

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Refers to work of A L Stevenson and Geoffrey Ingram Taylor. Comments on the use of terms 'oak' and 'spruce'.

Contains extra question - 'Is there any information contained in the paper which likely to be of value to the enemy?' Referee replies no.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

No received date.

Reference number
RR/68/77
Earliest possible date
26 August 1941
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Richard Vynne Southwell

View page for Richard Vynne Southwell

Use this record

Citation

Richard Vynne Southwell, Referee's report by Richard Vynne Southwell, on a paper 'Stress systems in aeolotropic plates. IV' by Albert Edward Green, 26 August 1941, RR/68/77, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_68_77/referees-report-by-richard-vynne-southwell-on-a-paper-stress-systems-in-aeolotropic-plates-iv-by-albert-edward-green, accessed on 22 July 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_68_77/referees-report-by-richard-vynne-southwell-on-a-paper-stress-systems-in-aeolotropic-plates-iv-by-albert-edward-green" title="Referee's report by Richard Vynne Southwell, on a paper 'Stress systems in aeolotropic plates. IV' by Albert Edward Green" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection