Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physiology

Communicated by Carl Frederick Abel Pantin. Archibald Vivian Hill suggests Alec Sand as a suitable referee, or alternatively Bryan Harold Cabot Matthews or Edgar Douglas Adrian, 1st Baron Adrian of Cambridge. Can the paper be passed if the first report is favourable? Howard Walter Florey, Baron Florey of Adelaide and Marston, does not known Alec Sand personally, requests Bryan Harold Cabot Matthews be asked to referee, or failing him, ask Edgar Douglas Adrian, 1st Baron Adrian of Cambridge. Agrees to pass the paper if the first report is favourable.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

No received date.

Reference number
RR/68/498
Earliest possible date
21 June 1944
Physical description
Memoranda
Page extent
1 page
Format
Typescript

Use this record

Citation

Memoranda, on a paper 'Action potentials from the isolated nerve cord of the earthworm' by William Albert Hugh Rushton, 21 June 1944, RR/68/498, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_68_498/memoranda-on-a-paper-action-potentials-from-the-isolated-nerve-cord-of-the-earthworm-by-william-albert-hugh-rushton, accessed on 10 December 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_68_498/memoranda-on-a-paper-action-potentials-from-the-isolated-nerve-cord-of-the-earthworm-by-william-albert-hugh-rushton" title="Memoranda, on a paper 'Action potentials from the isolated nerve cord of the earthworm' by William Albert Hugh Rushton" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    Dates: 1832 - 1954

    View collection