Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Botany

Recommended for publication in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. The work is clear and well presented. Has no special knowledge of the fossils which 'would warrant any more special comments'.

Contains extra question - 'Is there any information contained in the paper which likely to be of value to the enemy?' Referee replies no.

[Published in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]

No received date.

Reference number
RR/68/480
Earliest possible date
1944
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
1 page
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

William Henry Lang

View page for William Henry Lang

Use this record

Citation

William Henry Lang, Referee's report by William Henry Lang, on a paper 'A revision of Williamsoniella' by Thomas Maxwell Harris, 1944, RR/68/480, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_68_480/referees-report-by-william-henry-lang-on-a-paper-a-revision-of-williamsoniella-by-thomas-maxwell-harris, accessed on 13 October 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_68_480/referees-report-by-william-henry-lang-on-a-paper-a-revision-of-williamsoniella-by-thomas-maxwell-harris" title="Referee's report by William Henry Lang, on a paper 'A revision of Williamsoniella' by Thomas Maxwell Harris" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection