Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Zoology

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. The figures and the tables reproduce the same data. Suggests omitting some tables if space is tight, but would rather they all be printed.

Contains extra question - 'Is there any information contained in the paper which likely to be of value to the enemy?' Referee replies no.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

No received date.

Reference number
RR/68/454
Earliest possible date
1944
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
1 page
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Vincent Brian Wigglesworth

View page for Vincent Brian Wigglesworth

Use this record

Citation

Vincent Brian Wigglesworth, Referee's report by Vincent Brian Wigglesworth, on a paper 'Further experiments on insect competition' by A C Crombie, 1944, RR/68/454, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_68_454/referees-report-by-vincent-brian-wigglesworth-on-a-paper-further-experiments-on-insect-competition-by-a-c-crombie, accessed on 22 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_68_454/referees-report-by-vincent-brian-wigglesworth-on-a-paper-further-experiments-on-insect-competition-by-a-c-crombie" title="Referee's report by Vincent Brian Wigglesworth, on a paper 'Further experiments on insect competition' by A C Crombie" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection