Referee's report by David Keilin, on a paper 'Siderocytes in mammalian blood' by R A M Case
Reference number: RR/68/449
Sectional Committee: Physiology
Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Feels, however, that the Proceedings might not be the best channel for disseminating the information to specialists in the field. A paper such as this would be expected in journals such as the British Medical Journal, the Lancet or the Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology. Suggests the communicator Lancelot Thomas Hogben considers this point, but if he insists on publication in the Proceedings, he would accept the paper without discussion.
Contains extra question - 'Is there any information contained in the paper which likely to be of value to the enemy?' Referee replies no.
[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']
No received date.
- Reference number
- Earliest possible date
- Physical description
- Standardised form (type E)
- Page extent
- 1 page
David KeilinView page for David Keilin
Use this record
Export this record
David Keilin, Referee's report by David Keilin, on a paper 'Siderocytes in mammalian blood' by R A M Case, 1944, RR/68/449, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_68_449/referees-report-by-david-keilin-on-a-paper-siderocytes-in-mammalian-blood-by-r-a-m-case, accessed on 09 December 2023
Link to this record
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_68_449/referees-report-by-david-keilin-on-a-paper-siderocytes-in-mammalian-blood-by-r-a-m-case" title="Referee's report by David Keilin, on a paper 'Siderocytes in mammalian blood' by R A M Case" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Date: 7th August 1946
This item is part of:
Explore the collection
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection