Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics

Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'.

Contains extra question - 'Is there any information contained in the paper which likely to be of value to the enemy?' Referee replies no.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

No received date.

Reference number
RR/68/438
Earliest possible date
30 April 1944
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Basil Ferdinand Jamieson Schonland

View page for Basil Ferdinand Jamieson Schonland

Use this record

Citation

Basil Ferdinand Jamieson Schonland, Second referee's report by Basil Ferdinand Jamieson Schonland, on a paper 'The initiation of long electrical discharges' by C E R Bruce, 30 April 1944, RR/68/438, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_68_438/second-referees-report-by-basil-ferdinand-jamieson-schonland-on-a-paper-the-initiation-of-long-electrical-discharges-by-c-e-r-bruce, accessed on 17 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_68_438/second-referees-report-by-basil-ferdinand-jamieson-schonland-on-a-paper-the-initiation-of-long-electrical-discharges-by-c-e-r-bruce" title="Second referee's report by Basil Ferdinand Jamieson Schonland, on a paper 'The initiation of long electrical discharges' by C E R Bruce" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection