Referee's report by Arthur James Ewins, on a paper 'Experimental chemotherapy of typhus Anti-rickettsial action of p-sulphonamidobenzamidine and related compounds' by Christopher Howard Andrewes, Harold King and James Walker
Reference number: RR/68/427
Date: 1945
Description
Sectional Committee: Physiology
Recommended for publication in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London'. Finds the detailed description of the large number of compounds to be excessive.
Contains extra question - 'Is there any information contained in the paper which likely to be of value to the enemy?' Referee replies no.
[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']
No received date.
- Reference number
- RR/68/427
- Earliest possible date
- 1945
- Physical description
- Standardised form (type E)
- Page extent
- 1 page
- Format
- Manuscript
Use this record
Export this record
Citation
Arthur James Ewins, Referee's report by Arthur James Ewins, on a paper 'Experimental chemotherapy of typhus Anti-rickettsial action of p-sulphonamidobenzamidine and related compounds' by Christopher Howard Andrewes, Harold King and James Walker, 1945, RR/68/427, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_68_427/referees-report-by-arthur-james-ewins-on-a-paper-experimental-chemotherapy-of-typhus-anti-rickettsial-action-of-p-sulphonamidobenzamidine-and-related-compounds-by-christopher-howard-andrewes-harold-king-and-james-walker, accessed on 12 December 2024
Link to this record
https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_68_427/referees-report-by-arthur-james-ewins-on-a-paper-experimental-chemotherapy-of-typhus-anti-rickettsial-action-of-p-sulphonamidobenzamidine-and-related-compounds-by-christopher-howard-andrewes-harold-king-and-james-walker
Embed this record
<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_68_427/referees-report-by-arthur-james-ewins-on-a-paper-experimental-chemotherapy-of-typhus-anti-rickettsial-action-of-p-sulphonamidobenzamidine-and-related-compounds-by-christopher-howard-andrewes-harold-king-and-james-walker" title="Referee's report by Arthur James Ewins, on a paper 'Experimental chemotherapy of typhus Anti-rickettsial action of p-sulphonamidobenzamidine and related compounds' by Christopher Howard Andrewes, Harold King and James Walker" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
Related Publications
-
Experimental chemotherapy of typhus Anti-rickettsial action of p -sulphonamidobenzamidine and related compounds External link, opens in new tab.
Date: 1st January 1946
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1946.0002
Related Records
-
Referee's report by Charles Halliley Kellaway, on a paper 'Experimental chemotherapy of typhus Anti-rickettsial action of p-sulphonamidobenzamidine and related compounds' by Christopher Howard Andrewes, Harold King and James Walker
Creator: Charles Halliley Kellaway Reference number: RR/68/426 -
Letter to Arthur James Ewins, regarding a paper 'Experimental chemotherapy of typhus Anti-rickettsial action of p-sulphonamidobenzamidine and related compounds' by Christopher Howard Andrewes, Harold King and James Walker
Creator: Arthur James Ewins Reference number: RR/68/428 -
Letter from Arthur James Ewins, regarding a paper 'Experimental chemotherapy of typhus Anti-rickettsial action of p-sulphonamidobenzamidine and related compounds' by Christopher Howard Andrewes, Harold King and James Walker
Creator: Arthur James Ewins Reference number: RR/68/429
Hierarchy
This item is part of:
-
Referees' reports on scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1831- Reference number: RR -
Referees' reports: volume 68, peer reviews of scientific papers submitted to the Royal Society for publication
1941-1944 Reference number: RR/68
Related Fellows
-
Arthur James Ewins
Referee -
Christopher Howard Andrewes
Author -
Harold King
Author
Explore the collection
-
Referee Reports
Date: 1832-1954
This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.View collection