Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Physics

Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins has been in contact, and enquires 'whether a single paper of 18 pages would be acceptable by the Society'.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

No received date.

Reference number
RR/68/309
Earliest possible date
19 November 1942
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
1 page
Format
Manuscript

Use this record

Citation

Letter to Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton, from Nevill Francis Mott, regarding a paper 'Short period phosphorescence and electron traps' by G F J Garlick and Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins, 19 November 1942, RR/68/309, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_68_309/letter-to-alfred-charles-glyn-egerton-from-nevill-francis-mott-regarding-a-paper-short-period-phosphorescence-and-electron-traps-by-g-f-j-garlick-and-maurice-hugh-frederick-wilkins, accessed on 09 December 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_68_309/letter-to-alfred-charles-glyn-egerton-from-nevill-francis-mott-regarding-a-paper-short-period-phosphorescence-and-electron-traps-by-g-f-j-garlick-and-maurice-hugh-frederick-wilkins" title="Letter to Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton, from Nevill Francis Mott, regarding a paper 'Short period phosphorescence and electron traps' by G F J Garlick and Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Records

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection