Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional Committee: Zoology

Returns referee's report. Has discussed the paper with Henry Hallett Dale and the author, and has studied the specimens. The author has amended and revised the original manuscript, with Henry Hallett Dale's approval. Is writing to Hill to explain the situation [RR/68/127]. The author has withdrawn one of the figures.

[Published in the 'Proceedings of the Royal Society of London']

Endorsed on recto as received 1 September 1941.

Reference number
RR/68/129
Earliest possible date
29 August 1941
Physical description
Letter on paper
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Cecil Clifford Dobell

View page for Cecil Clifford Dobell

Use this record

Citation

Cecil Clifford Dobell, Third letter from Cecil Clifford Dobell, regarding a paper 'A study of the nuclear apparatus of bacteria' by C F Robinow, 29 August 1941, RR/68/129, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_68_129/third-letter-from-cecil-clifford-dobell-regarding-a-paper-a-study-of-the-nuclear-apparatus-of-bacteria-by-c-f-robinow, accessed on 25 May 2024

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_68_129/third-letter-from-cecil-clifford-dobell-regarding-a-paper-a-study-of-the-nuclear-apparatus-of-bacteria-by-c-f-robinow" title="Third letter from Cecil Clifford Dobell, regarding a paper 'A study of the nuclear apparatus of bacteria' by C F Robinow" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1949

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection