Skip to content

Please be aware that some material may contain words, descriptions or illustrations which will not reflect current scientific understanding and may be considered in today's context inaccurate, unethical, offensive or distressing.

Description

Sectional committee: Zoology

Recommended for publication in Philosophical Transactions. It is a valuable contribution to knowledge of a remarkable fish.

Contains extra question - 'Is there any information contained in the paper which likely to be of value to the enemy?' Referee replies no.

[Published in Philosophical Transactions B, 1940].

Endorsed on verso as received 22 August 1940.

Reference number
RR/67/303
Earliest possible date
21 August 1940
Physical description
Standardised form (type E)
Page extent
2 pages
Format
Manuscript

Creator name

Arthur Smith Woodward

View page for Arthur Smith Woodward

Use this record

Citation

Arthur Smith Woodward, Referee's report by Arthur Smith Woodward, on a paper 'The Devonian fish Palaeospondylus gunni Traquair' by J A Moy-Thomas, 21 August 1940, RR/67/303, The Royal Society Archives, London, https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/items/rr_67_303/referees-report-by-arthur-smith-woodward-on-a-paper-the-devonian-fish-palaeospondylus-gunni-traquair-by-j-a-moy-thomas, accessed on 22 January 2025

Link to this record

Embed this record

<iframe src="https://makingscience.royalsociety.org/embed/items/rr_67_303/referees-report-by-arthur-smith-woodward-on-a-paper-the-devonian-fish-palaeospondylus-gunni-traquair-by-j-a-moy-thomas" title="Referee's report by Arthur Smith Woodward, on a paper 'The Devonian fish Palaeospondylus gunni Traquair' by J A Moy-Thomas" allow="fullscreen" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>

Related Publications

Related Fellows

Explore the collection

  • Referee Reports

    Date: 1832-1954

    This collection contains reports on scientific papers submitted for publication to the Royal Society. Started in 1832 when the system was formalised, it is a record of the origins of peer review publishing in practice.

    View collection